Finney v. Gilder

73 Ala. 196
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1882·Published

Opinion

SOMERYILLE, J.

— The judgment rendered was erroneous and must be reversed. It was a judgment by default, and there was only an achnowledgment of service of process indorsed on the summons and complaint. This did not, under the long settled practice in this State, authorize the rendition [197]*197of such a judgment without proof, or admission of the fact of service, appearing of record. ' The record here fails to show that the acknowledgment or signature was proved, or admitted in court to be genuine. — O'Neal v. Garrett, 3 Ala. 276; 1 Brick. Dig. 138, § 99; Harris v. Martin, 39 Ala. 556.

Beversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finney v. Gilder, 73 Ala. 196 (Ala. 1882).

73 Ala. 196 (Finney v. Gilder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

O'Neal v. Garrett
3 Ala. 276 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1842)
Harris v. Martin
39 Ala. 556 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1865)