Finnell v. Virginia

48 F. App'x 473
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedOctober 21, 2002
DocketNo. 02-7119
StatusPublished

This text of 48 F. App'x 473 (Finnell v. Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finnell v. Virginia, 48 F. App'x 473 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alfred Wayne Finnell appeals the district court’s order summarily dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Insofar as Finnell is attempting to challenge his federal conviction, we find it barred by the rule announced in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 114 S.Ct. 2364, 129 L.Ed.2d 383 (1994). We also find the action barred by the statute of limitations. Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985). Accordingly, [474]*474we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wilson v. Garcia
471 U.S. 261 (Supreme Court, 1985)
Heck v. Humphrey
512 U.S. 477 (Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 F. App'x 473, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finnell-v-virginia-ca4-2002.