Finnegan v. Selengut

2 A.D.2d 883, 156 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3869

This text of 2 A.D.2d 883 (Finnegan v. Selengut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finnegan v. Selengut, 2 A.D.2d 883, 156 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Opinion

Upon the trial of this action for a judgment declaring the rights of stockholders and directors of this New Jersey corporation, it was disclosed that a proceeding was pending in the New Jersey courts in which the issues involved in this case would necessarily have to be decided. Under the circumstances, the discretionary remedy of declaratory judgment should be withheld and the judgment appealed from unanimously modified so as to provide for the dismissal of the defendants’ counterclaim and, as so modified, affirmed. (City of New York v. Maltbie, 248 App. Div. 39; Trustees of Columbia University v. Kalvin, 226 App. Div. 775.) Settle order on notice. Concur-—-Breitel, J. P., Botein, Rabin, Frank and Yalente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Trustees of Columbia University v. Nathan Kalvin
226 A.D. 775 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)
City of New York v. Maltbie
248 A.D. 39 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 A.D.2d 883, 156 N.Y.S.2d 508, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finnegan-v-selengut-nyappdiv-1956.