Finnegan v. Sale
This text of 54 Kan. 420 (Finnegan v. Sale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the court was delivered by
This is an original action to compel Dennis Sale, as register of deeds of Marshall county, Kansas, to file [421]*421with the county clerk, a statement of fees collected by him for the quarter ending March 31, 1894, in accordance with the requirements of chapter 91 of the- Laws of 1893. Section 8 of this act reads as follows:
“This act shall take effect and be in force from and after the close of the present term of the officers herein named, except, that the provisions of this act relating to the reports, to be made by the several officers herein named, to the county clerk, shall take effect and be in force from and after the publication of this act in the official state paper.” •
As this section provides for the taking effect of different parts of the act at different times, it falls within the rule declared in Comm’rs of Miami Co. v. Hiner, ante p. 334, and is therefore unconstitutional and void. The provisions of the act under consideration are even more objectionable than those of chapter 80, Laws of 1893, which were under consideration in the case above cited. Section 5 of this act requires not only the filing of the statements, but that all fees collected shall be turned over to the county treasurer and become a part of the county fund, and in order to uphold the enactment, it would be necessary by construction to materially modify the provisions of § 5. The writ will be denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
54 Kan. 420, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finnegan-v-sale-kan-1894.