Finnegan v. Dugan
This text of 96 Mass. 197 (Finnegan v. Dugan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The fact of a resemblance between the child and the putative father was proper for the consideration of the jury. It is a well known physiological fact that peculiarities of feature and personal traits are often transmitted from parent to child. Taken by itself, proof of such resemblance would be insufficient to establish the paternity; but it would be clearly a circumstance to be considered, in connection with other facts tending to prove the issue on which the jury are to pass.
Exceptions overruled.
See Gilmanlown v. Ham, 38 N. H. 108.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
96 Mass. 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finnegan-v-dugan-mass-1867.