Finn v. Spiker

Fourth Circuit

Finn v. Spiker

172 F. App'x 509

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 2, 2006·No. No. 05-7516·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

William M. Finn appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply with a court order regarding filing fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Finn v. Spiker, No. CA-05-542-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

William M. Finn appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action for failure to comply with a court order regarding filing fees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Finn v. Spiker, No. CA-05-542-3 (E.D.Va. Sept. 13, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Finn v. Spiker, 172 F. App'x 509 (4th Cir. 2006).

Pincite

172 F. App'x 509 (Finn v. Spiker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related