Finn v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Finn v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott

15 A.D.2d 989, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10973

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 14, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 15 A.D.2d 989 (Finn v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finn v. Merritt, Chapman & Scott, 15 A.D.2d 989, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10973 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion insofar as it seeks an order permitting prosecution of claimant-appellant’s appeal as a poor person granted and Goldstein & Goldstein, Esqs., 274 Broadway, Montieello, N. Y., are hereby assigned as attorneys for the appellant. Application to prosecute appeal on original papers on file with the Workmen’s Com[990]*990pensation Board denied. The appellant should undertake to agree with the Attorney-General on a shortened record of which a single typewritten copy may be filed. If the parties cannot agree on the record application may be made to the court for appropriate directions. Appellant may file a brief in five typewritten copies.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion insofar as it seeks an order permitting prosecution of claimant-appellant’s appeal as a poor person granted and Goldstein & Goldstein, Esqs., 274 Broadway, Montieello, N. Y., are hereby assigned as attorneys for the appellant. Application to prosecute appeal on original papers on file with the Workmen’s Com[990]*990pensation Board denied. The appellant should undertake to agree with the Attorney-General on a shortened record of which a single typewritten copy may be filed. If the parties cannot agree on the record application may be made to the court for appropriate directions. Appellant may file a brief in five typewritten copies.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 A.D.2d 989, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10973, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finn-v-merritt-chapman-scott-nyappdiv-1962.