Finn v. Bond, Ch. J.

197 S.W.2d 108, 145 Tex. 244, 1946 Tex. LEXIS 154
Texas Supreme Court·Decided November 6, 1946·No. No. A-1007.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

per curiam:

The motion for leave to file a petition for mandamus to compel the Court of Civil Appeals at Dallas to certify certain questions on the ground of conflict of the courts in the construction of Article 4632 of the Revised Civil Statutes is overruled, because the Court of Civil Appeals in this case (195 S. W. (2d) 679) correctly held that under Article 4632, which requires “full and satisfactory evidence” to support a decree of divorce, corroboration of the testimony of the complaining spouse is not an indispensable requirement,, as a matter of law, even where a denial is entered.

Opinion delivered November 6, 1946.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finn v. Bond, Ch. J., 197 S.W.2d 108, 145 Tex. 244, 1946 Tex. LEXIS 154 (Tex. 1946).

197 S.W.2d 108 (Finn v. Bond, Ch. J.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Houssiere v. Houssiere
389 S.W.2d 533 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1965)
Meyer v. Meyer
361 S.W.2d 935 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Sloan v. Sloan
228 S.W.2d 294 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1950)
Ellis v. Ellis
225 S.W.2d 216 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1949)