Finley v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Finley v. State

75 So. 1005, 16 Ala. App. 691

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 10, 1917

Docket7 Div. 424.

StatusPublished

This text of 75 So. 1005 (Finley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finley v. State, 75 So. 1005, 16 Ala. App. 691 (Ala. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the county court of Shelby county of the offense of petit larceny. The cause was tried by the court without á jury, and from a judgment of conviction the defendant appeals. The only error complained of was the judgment of the court on the evidence. We have carefully considered the evidence, as shown by the bill of exceptions, and. from the evidence, we cannot say the court was in error. There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAMFORD, J.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the county court of Shelby county of the offense of petit larceny. The cause was tried by the court without á jury, and from a judgment of conviction the defendant appeals. The only error complained of was the judgment of the court on the evidence. We have carefully considered the evidence, as shown by the bill of exceptions, and. from the evidence, we cannot say the court was in error. There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

75 So. 1005, 16 Ala. App. 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finley-v-state-alactapp-1917.