Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Finkley v. State

Finkley v. State

838 So. 2d 1227, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2859, 2003 WL 827349
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 7, 2003
DocketNo. 2D03-24
StatusPublished

This text of 838 So. 2d 1227 (Finkley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finkley v. State, 838 So. 2d 1227, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2859, 2003 WL 827349 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

George A. Finkley appeals the dismissal of his motion for postconvietion relief filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. The trial court dismissed Finkley’s motion because it failed to contain a brief statement of facts relied on in support of the motion as required by rule 3.850(c)(6). We affirm the trial court’s order of dismissal without prejudice to Finkley to refile a motion which conforms to the rule. See Pavey v. State, 720 So.2d 563 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); Toler v. State, 818 So.2d 639 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002).

Affirmed.

CASANUEVA and STRINGER, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pavey v. State
720 So. 2d 563 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Toler v. State
818 So. 2d 639 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
838 So. 2d 1227, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 2859, 2003 WL 827349, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finkley-v-state-fladistctapp-2003.