Finkle v. CARROLL III
44 A.3d 184, 305 Conn. 907
Opinion
Jennie FINKLE, Administratrix (Estate of Barbara A. Eckert)
v.
John F. CARROLL III et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Steven D. Ecker, Hartford, and M. Caitlin S. Anderson, in support of the petition.
Scott M. Karsten, in opposition.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 278, 37 A.3d 851, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the plaintiffs action was not saved by General Statutes § 52-593?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Finkle v. CARROLL III, 44 A.3d 184, 305 Conn. 907 (Colo. 2012).
44 A.3d 184 (Finkle v. CARROLL III) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Finkle v. Carroll
Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2015
Owen v. Commissioner of Correction
44 A.3d 184 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2012)