Finkle v. CARROLL III
This text of 44 A.3d 184 (Finkle v. CARROLL III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Jennie FINKLE, Administratrix (Estate of Barbara A. Eckert)
v.
John F. CARROLL III et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Steven D. Ecker, Hartford, and M. Caitlin S. Anderson, in support of the petition.
Scott M. Karsten, in opposition.
The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 134 Conn.App. 278, 37 A.3d 851, is granted, limited to the following issue:
"Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the plaintiffs action was not saved by General Statutes § 52-593?"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
44 A.3d 184, 305 Conn. 907, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finkle-v-carroll-iii-conn-2012.