Finkelstein v. Rabinowitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Finkelstein v. Rabinowitz

237 A.D. 848

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 237 A.D. 848 (Finkelstein v. Rabinowitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finkelstein v. Rabinowitz, 237 A.D. 848 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

[849]*849Order in so far as it denies defendant’s motion to vacate the notice for the taking of defendant’s deposition before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. We are of opinion that the matters enumerated in the plaintiff’s notice are not the proper subject for examination before trial. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[849]*849Order in so far as it denies defendant’s motion to vacate the notice for the taking of defendant’s deposition before trial reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. We are of opinion that the matters enumerated in the plaintiff’s notice are not the proper subject for examination before trial. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Seudder and Davis, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 A.D. 848, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finkelstein-v-rabinowitz-nyappdiv-1932.