Finkelstein v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

152 Misc. 439, 273 N.Y.S. 629, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1520
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided July 25, 1934·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Inasmuch as the insured’s doctor advised him to submit to an operation for hernia, and testified that in his opinion a prudent man would have followed that advice, it cannot be held [440] that the condition from which the insured was suffering constituted a total and permanent disability within the meaning of the policy. (See Palloni v. Brooklyn-Manhattan Transit ,Corp., 215 App. Div. 634.)

Judgment reversed, with thirty dollars costs, and complaint dismissed on the merits, with costs.

All concur; present, Callahan, Frankenthaler and Shientag, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finkelstein v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 152 Misc. 439, 273 N.Y.S. 629, 1934 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1520 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

152 Misc. 439 (Finkelstein v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Blasbalg v. Massachusetts Casualty Insurance
962 F. Supp. 362 (E.D. New York, 1997)
Claim of Gilbert v. Towns of Pendleton & Amherst
165 Misc. 222 (New York County Courts, 1937)
Muzio v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
249 A.D. 177 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Deakter v. Mutual Life. Ins.
12 F. Supp. 182 (W.D. Pennsylvania, 1935)