Finkelstein v. Kessler

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Finkelstein v. Kessler

84 N.Y.S. 266

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 22, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 84 N.Y.S. 266 (Finkelstein v. Kessler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finkelstein v. Kessler, 84 N.Y.S. 266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment herein must be reversed. The written guaranty given by the defendant to the plaintiff, in which [267]*267he became responsible for goods subsequently sold by plaintiff to one Abelsohn, did not need to express consideration. Chapter 464, p. 802, Laws 1863; Evansville Nat. Bank v. Kaufman, 93 N. Y. 273, 45 Am. Rep. 204; Everson v. Gere, 122 N. Y. 293, 25 N. E. 492.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The judgment herein must be reversed. The written guaranty given by the defendant to the plaintiff, in which [267]*267he became responsible for goods subsequently sold by plaintiff to one Abelsohn, did not need to express consideration. Chapter 464, p. 802, Laws 1863; Evansville Nat. Bank v. Kaufman, 93 N. Y. 273, 45 Am. Rep. 204; Everson v. Gere, 122 N. Y. 293, 25 N. E. 492.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 N.Y.S. 266, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finkelstein-v-kessler-nyappterm-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack