Finkelstein v. Kessler
84 N.Y.S. 266
Opinion
The judgment herein must be reversed. The written guaranty given by the defendant to the plaintiff, in which [267] he became responsible for goods subsequently sold by plaintiff to one Abelsohn, did not need to express consideration. Chapter 464, p. 802, Laws 1863; Evansville Nat. Bank v. Kaufman, 93 N. Y. 273, 45 Am. Rep. 204; Everson v. Gere, 122 N. Y. 293, 25 N. E. 492.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Finkelstein v. Kessler, 84 N.Y.S. 266 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1903).
84 N.Y.S. 266 (Finkelstein v. Kessler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ruzicka v. Hotovy
101 N.W. 328 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1904)