Finkelstein v. Kesalp Realty Corp.

279 A.D. 939, 111 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5376
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 31, 1952
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 279 A.D. 939 (Finkelstein v. Kesalp Realty Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finkelstein v. Kesalp Realty Corp., 279 A.D. 939, 111 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5376 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1952).

Opinion

Assuming that the complaint states a cause of action against the seller for. commissions earned, agents who, acting within the scope of their authority, induce the principal to breach a contract are not liable in damages to the other party to the contract. (Greyhound Corp. v. Commercial Cas. Ins. Co., 259 App. Div. 317.) We construe the allegation that appellants controlled the seller corporation as an averment that they were its agents. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See post, p 1077.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burger v. Brookhaven Medical Arts Building, Inc.
131 A.D.2d 622 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Shaw v. Merrick
60 A.D.2d 830 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Katz v. Thompson
19 Misc. 2d 848 (New York County Courts, 1959)
Schoenbrun v. M. J. B. Holding Corp.
13 Misc. 2d 574 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Terry v. Zachry
272 S.W.2d 157 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1954)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
279 A.D. 939, 111 N.Y.S.2d 282, 1952 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finkelstein-v-kesalp-realty-corp-nyappdiv-1952.