Finkelstein v. Ingram
91 S.E. 787, 19 Ga. App. 483, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 177
This text of 91 S.E. 787 (Finkelstein v. Ingram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Finkelstein v. Ingram, 91 S.E. 787, 19 Ga. App. 483, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 177 (Ga. Ct. App. 1917).
Opinion
1. All issues raised in a petition for certiorari must be determined upon the answer to the petition; and where the answer does not verify the allegations of the petition, the trial court will consider only the issues shown by the answer.
2. Upon the petition for certiorari and the answer the judge of the superior court did not err in overruling the certiorari.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lewenstein v. Curry
42 S.E.2d 158 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1947)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
91 S.E. 787, 19 Ga. App. 483, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finkelstein-v-ingram-gactapp-1917.