Finkelstein v. Finkelstein

266 A.D.2d 504, 698 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12211
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Finkelstein v. Finkelstein. Read the opinion of the Court — 268 A.D.2d 273

Opinion

—In an action for a divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals, as limited by his brief, from stated portions of a decision of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Harkavy, J.), dated March 3, 1998.

Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs to the respondent, as no appeal lies from a decision (see, Schicchi v Green Constr. Corp., 100 AD2d 509). Ritter, J. P., McGinity, H. Miller and Feuerstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finkelstein v. Finkelstein, 266 A.D.2d 504, 698 N.Y.S.2d 902, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12211 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 504 (Finkelstein v. Finkelstein) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schicchi v. J. A. Green Construction Corp.
100 A.D.2d 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)