Finkelstein v. Brodsky

163 A. 664, 110 N.J.L. 13, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 402
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 5, 1933·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Circuit Court Judge Ackerson, to whom the case was referred and whose opinion is printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 55.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 16.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finkelstein v. Brodsky, 163 A. 664, 110 N.J.L. 13, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 402 (N.J. 1933).

163 A. 664 (Finkelstein v. Brodsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McEnaney v. Spedick
80 A.2d 237 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)