Finkelstein v. Brodsky
163 A. 664, 110 N.J.L. 13, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 402
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Circuit Court Judge Ackerson, to whom the case was referred and whose opinion is printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 55.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 16.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Finkelstein v. Brodsky, 163 A. 664, 110 N.J.L. 13, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 402 (N.J. 1933).
163 A. 664 (Finkelstein v. Brodsky) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McEnaney v. Spedick
80 A.2d 237 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)