Finkelstein v. Brodsky
This text of 163 A. 664 (Finkelstein v. Brodsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Circuit Court Judge Ackerson, to whom the case was referred and whose opinion is printed in 10 N. J. Mis. R. 55.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chiee Justice, Teen-chard, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Brogan, Heher, Yan Buskiek, Kays, Heteield, Dear, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 16.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
163 A. 664, 110 N.J.L. 13, 1933 N.J. LEXIS 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finkelstein-v-brodsky-nj-1933.