Finkelstein & Kommel v. The United States

Supreme Court

Finkelstein & Kommel v. The United States

275 U.S. 501

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided December 12, 1927·No. 346·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Reversed on the authority of United States v. Fish, 268 U. S. 607, 612; the decision being that § 489 of the Tariff Act of 1922 (c. 356, 42 Stat. 858, 962; U. S. C., Title 19, § 361) does not forbid the Customs Court to adopt rulés of practice permitting the filing of such petitions before liquidation, that it has jurisdiction to consider petitions so filed, and its decision in this case granting the petition was not ineffective for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Reversed on the authority of United States v. Fish, 268 U. S. 607, 612; the decision being that § 489 of the Tariff Act of 1922 (c. 356, 42 Stat. 858, 962; U. S. C., Title 19, § 361) does not forbid the Customs Court to adopt rulés of practice permitting the filing of such petitions before liquidation, that it has jurisdiction to consider petitions so filed, and its decision in this case granting the petition was not ineffective for want of jurisdiction.

Finkelstein & Kommel v. The United States, 275 U.S. 501 (1927).

Pincite

275 U.S. 501 (Finkelstein & Kommel v. The United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related