Finkelstein & Kommel v. The United States

Supreme Court

Finkelstein & Kommel v. The United States

275 U.S. 501

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedDecember 12, 1927

Docket346

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 275 U.S. 501 (Finkelstein & Kommel v. The United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finkelstein & Kommel v. The United States, 275 U.S. 501 (1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Reversed on the authority of United States v. Fish, 268 U. S. 607, 612; the decision being that § 489 of the Tariff Act of 1922 (c. 356, 42 Stat. 858, 962; U. S. C., Title 19, § 361) does not forbid the Customs Court to adopt rulés of practice permitting the filing of such petitions before liquidation, that it has jurisdiction to consider petitions so filed, and its decision in this case granting the petition was not ineffective for want of jurisdiction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Reversed on the authority of United States v. Fish, 268 U. S. 607, 612; the decision being that § 489 of the Tariff Act of 1922 (c. 356, 42 Stat. 858, 962; U. S. C., Title 19, § 361) does not forbid the Customs Court to adopt rulés of practice permitting the filing of such petitions before liquidation, that it has jurisdiction to consider petitions so filed, and its decision in this case granting the petition was not ineffective for want of jurisdiction.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 U.S. 501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finkelstein-kommel-v-the-united-states-scotus-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack