Finkel v. Lozea

281 A.D. 810, 118 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3363

This text of 281 A.D. 810 (Finkel v. Lozea) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finkel v. Lozea, 281 A.D. 810, 118 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3363 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).

Opinion

On defendant’s motion to strike allegations, plaintiffs’ counsel, on argument, consented to have stricken the words and still is ” from paragraph third of the amended complaint. The word “ arbitrarily ” in paragraph seventh is directed to be stricken. Accordingly, on defendant’s appeal, the order is unanimously modified to strike out the above-quoted words, and, as so modified, affirmed. On plaintiffs’ appeal, the order is unanimously affirmed in all respects, with $20 costs and disbursements to the defendant-respondent. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Van Yoorhis and Breitel, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 A.D. 810, 118 N.Y.S.2d 756, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finkel-v-lozea-nyappdiv-1953.