Fink v. Sterling Smokeless Coal Co.

60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24791, 1995 WL 418953
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 6, 1995
Docket94-2147
StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 821 (Fink v. Sterling Smokeless Coal Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fink v. Sterling Smokeless Coal Co., 60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24791, 1995 WL 418953 (4th Cir. 1995).

Opinion

60 F.3d 821
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Nora J. FINK, Widow of Thomas E. Fink, Petitioner,
v.
STERLING SMOKELESS COAL COMPANY; Old Republic Insurance
Company; Director, Office of Workers'
Compensation Programs, United States
Department of Labor, Respondents.

No. 94-2147.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 3, 1995.
Decided: July 6, 1995.

Nora J. Fink, petitioner pro se. Mark Elliott Solomons, Laura Metcoff Klaus, Arter & Hadden, Washington, DC; Patricia May Nece, Elizabeth Ann Goodman, United States Department of Labor, Washington, DC, for respondents.

Ben.Rev.Bd.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINSON, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. Secs. 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.1994). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision is based upon substantial evidence and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Fink v. Sterling Smokeless Coal Co., No. 89-5095-BLA (B.R.B. Aug. 23, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 F.3d 821, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 24791, 1995 WL 418953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fink-v-sterling-smokeless-coal-co-ca4-1995.