Fink v. Smith

95 A. 106, 249 Pa. 541, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 760
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMay 17, 1915
DocketAppeal, No. 187
StatusPublished

This text of 95 A. 106 (Fink v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fink v. Smith, 95 A. 106, 249 Pa. 541, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 760 (Pa. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The negligence of the defendant and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff were, under all the evidence, questions for the jury, and no reversible error is discoverable in the submission of those questions to them. While that portion of the charge which is the subject of the tenth assignment is not approved, it does not call for a retrial of the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 A. 106, 249 Pa. 541, 1915 Pa. LEXIS 760, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fink-v-smith-pa-1915.