Fink v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company
This text of 676 S.E.2d 902 (Fink v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Johnny A. FINK
v.
GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY d/b/a Kelly Springfield, Employer, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Carrier.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Gina E. Cammarano, N. Victor Farah, Raleigh, for Fink.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendants on the 6th day of January 2009 for Writ of Supersedeas of the judgment of the Court of Appeals, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of April 2009."
Upon consideration of the petition filed on the 6th day of January 2009 by Defendants in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 30th day of April 2009."
HUDSON, J., recused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
676 S.E.2d 902, 363 N.C. 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fink-v-goodyear-tire-rubber-company-nc-2009.