Fink v. Bryden

New York Supreme Court

Fink v. Bryden

3 Johns. 244

DecidedMay 15, 1808

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Johns. 244 (Fink v. Bryden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fink v. Bryden, 3 Johns. 244 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1808).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The affidavit of the defendant ought to ° , state, that fin inquest was taken by default in the cause. The certificate of the clerk cannot be received unless a copy of it has been served on the opposite attorney. But as there appears to have been some misapprehension by the attorney for the defendant, as to the practice, he may give new notice, and make his application again at the last non-¡enumerated day in this term:

N. B. The application was renewed, on the last non* enumerated day, on a new affidavit, upon which the court granted the rule.

Rule granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The affidavit of the defendant ought to ° , state, that fin inquest was taken by default in the cause. The certificate of the clerk cannot be received unless a copy of it has been served on the opposite attorney. But as there appears to have been some misapprehension by the attorney for the defendant, as to the practice, he may give new notice, and make his application again at the last non-¡enumerated day in this term:

N. B. The application was renewed, on the last non* enumerated day, on a new affidavit, upon which the court granted the rule.

Rule granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Johns. 244, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fink-v-bryden-nysupct-1808.