Fink v. Ash

24 S.E. 976, 99 Ga. 106
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided May 19, 1896·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The evidence warranted the verdict, which was reasonable in amount, and if the court committed any error at all, it was not such as would require a new trial.

Judgment affirmed; cross-hill of exceptions dismissed.

Action for damages. Before Judge Harris. City court of Floyd county. March term, 1895. McOutohm & Shumate and Hoskinson & Harris, for receivers. Dean cG Dean, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fink v. Ash, 24 S.E. 976, 99 Ga. 106 (Ga. 1896).

24 S.E. 976 (Fink v. Ash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Johnson
1918 OK 438 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)