Fink v. Ash
24 S.E. 976, 99 Ga. 106
Opinion
The evidence warranted the verdict, which was reasonable in amount, and if the court committed any error at all, it was not such as would require a new trial.
Judgment affirmed; cross-hill of exceptions dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fink v. Ash, 24 S.E. 976, 99 Ga. 106 (Ga. 1896).
24 S.E. 976 (Fink v. Ash) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Johnson
1918 OK 438 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)