Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Fink v. Ash

Fink v. Ash

24 S.E. 976, 99 Ga. 106
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedMay 19, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 S.E. 976 (Fink v. Ash) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fink v. Ash, 24 S.E. 976, 99 Ga. 106 (Ga. 1896).

Opinion

Simmons, C. J.

The evidence warranted the verdict, which was reasonable in amount, and if the court committed any error at all, it was not such as would require a new trial.

Judgment affirmed; cross-hill of exceptions dismissed.

Action for damages. Before Judge Harris. City court of Floyd county. March term, 1895. McOutohm & Shumate and Hoskinson & Harris, for receivers. Dean cG Dean, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Johnson
1918 OK 438 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1918)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
24 S.E. 976, 99 Ga. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fink-v-ash-ga-1896.