Fink v. Albany & Susquehanna Railroad
4 Lans. 147
Opinion
A new trial is granted upon the ground that the plaintiff had no right to take the train he was removed from, without paying his fare to the next station at which it was to stop, as it did not regularly stop at the station he desired to ride to, and did not in fact stop there on the occasion in controversy, and for the additional reason that the recovery should not have exceeded the actual damages.
Ordered accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Fink v. Albany & Susquehanna Railroad, 4 Lans. 147 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1871).
4 Lans. 147 (Fink v. Albany & Susquehanna Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Moon v. Interurban Street Railway Co.
85 N.Y.S. 363 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1903)
Miller v. King
21 A.D. 192 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1897)
Miller v. King
34 N.Y.S. 425 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Plott v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.
63 Wis. 511 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1885)