Finjan LLC v. ESET, LLC

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. California
DecidedApril 3, 2023
Docket3:17-cv-00183
StatusUnknown

This text of Finjan LLC v. ESET, LLC (Finjan LLC v. ESET, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finjan LLC v. ESET, LLC, (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FINJAN, LLC., Case No.: 17-cv-183-CAB-BGS

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING JOINT 13 v. MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL EXHIBITS TO JOINT STATEMENT 14 ESET, LLC and ESET SPOL. SR.O., RE FURTHER RELIEF 15 Defendants. 16 [ECF 901] 17 18 19 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to File Under Seal Exhibits to Joint 20 Statement Re Further Relief. (ECF 901). It seeks to file five exhibits that were submitted 21 in support of the parties’ Joint Statement (ECF 903) under seal—Exhibits 1, 2, and 3 to 22 the Declaration of Nicola A. Pisano (“Pisano Decl.”) and Exhibits A and B to the 23 Declaration of Nicole Williams (“Williams Decl.”). (ECF 901.) The Joint Statement these 24 exhibits were filed in support of, and other exhibits were filed publicly. (ECF 903.) 25 Because the documents the parties seek to file under seal were filed in support of 26 briefing on a discovery dispute, their request to file under seal is subject to a showing of 27 good cause. See Kamankana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1179-80 (9th 28 Cir. 2003) (distinguishing between filing documents under seal in support of a non- | dispositive discovery motion, subject to good cause, and filing documents under seal in 2 support of a dispositive motion, subject to compelling reasons standard); see also Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135-37 (9th Cir. 2003). 4 In support of sealing these exhibits, counsel for Finjan has submitted a declaration. 5 (Decl. of K. Nicole Williams in Support of Parties’ Joint Motion to File Documents 6 || Under Seal (“Williams Decl. in Support of Sealing”) [ECF 901-1].) The declaration 7 explains that Exhibits 1-3 contain highly sensitive business information such as non- 8 public financial figures as well as licensing, acquisition, and litigation strategy, and 9 || Exhibits A and B contain highly sensitive financial figures and confidential agreement 10 Il terms. (Id. §§| 4-5.) Counsel also explains that these exhibits are confidentially 11 || maintained by Finjan in its regular course of business and that their public disclosure 12 could harm Finjan’s business and competitive positions. (/d. 4 6.) Additionally, the Court 13 || has reviewed the exhibits. 14 Based on the foregoing, the Court finds good cause to GRANT the Joint Motion. || The Clerk shall file these exhibits under seal. 16 17 IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 Dated: April 3, 2023 7 2 p / / 19 on. Bernard G. Skomal 20 United States Magistrate Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Finjan LLC v. ESET, LLC, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finjan-llc-v-eset-llc-casd-2023.