Finister v. State ex rel. DOTD

888 So. 2d 214, 2004 La. LEXIS 3608, 2004 WL 2997634
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided November 24, 2004·No. No. 2004-C-0194·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In re Transportation and Development Department of; Louisiana, State of et al.; — Defendant(s); Applying for Writ of Certiorari and/or Review, Parish of St. Landry, 27th Judicial District Court Div. D, No. 00-4116; to the Court of Appeal, Third Circuit, No. CA 03-766.

WRIT GRANTED IN PART and REMANDED TO DISTRICT COURT. Based on Bozeman v. State, 03-1016 (La.7/2/04), 879 So.2d 692, we reverse the portion of the judgment allowing plaintiffs recovery of that portion of Angel Spur-lock’s medical expenses that constituted a write-off by the health care provider pursuant to its acceptance of Medicaid benefits. Spurlock is entitled to recover only the amount actually paid by Medicaid. We remand to the district court for rendition of a judgment in conformity with this order. In all other respects, the writ is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finister v. State ex rel. DOTD, 888 So. 2d 214, 2004 La. LEXIS 3608, 2004 WL 2997634 (La. 2004).

888 So. 2d 214 (Finister v. State ex rel. DOTD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Johnson v. CLD, Inc.
179 So. 3d 695 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2015)