Fininen, Richard Charles
This text of Fininen, Richard Charles (Fininen, Richard Charles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-47,915-04
EX PARTE RICHARD CHARLES FININEN, Applicant
ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 2015F00270A IN THE 5TH DISTRICT COURT FROM CASS COUNTY
Per curiam.
ORDER
Applicant was convicted of bail jumping and failure to appear and sentenced to forty years’
imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Fininen v. State, No. 06-16-
00039-CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana Oct. 27, 2016)(not designated for publication). Applicant filed
this application for a writ of habeas corpus in the county of conviction, and the district clerk
forwarded it to this Court. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07.
Applicant contends that appellate counsel failed to timely inform Applicant that his
conviction had been affirmed. Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief.
Ex parte Wilson, 956 S.W.2d 25 (Tex. Crim. App. 1997); Ex parte Crow, 180 S.W.3d 135 (Tex.
Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, the record should be developed. The trial court is the appropriate 2
forum for findings of fact. TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). The trial court shall order
appellate counsel to respond to Applicant’s claim. In developing the record, the trial court may use
any means set out in Article 11.07, § 3(d). If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine
whether Applicant is indigent. If Applicant is indigent and wants to be represented by counsel, the
trial court shall appoint counsel to represent him at the hearing. See TEX . CODE CRIM . PROC. art.
26.04. If counsel is appointed or retained, the trial court shall immediately notify this Court of
counsel’s name.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether appellate
counsel timely informed Applicant that his conviction had been affirmed. The trial court shall also
determine whether Applicant would have timely filed a petition for discretionary review but for
appellate counsel’s alleged deficient performance. The trial court may make any other findings and
conclusions that it deems appropriate in response to Applicant’s claim.
The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law within ninety days from
the date of this order. The district clerk shall then immediately forward to this Court the trial court’s
findings and conclusions and the record developed on remand, including, among other things,
affidavits, motions, objections, proposed findings and conclusions, orders, and transcripts from
hearings and depositions. See TEX . R. APP . P. 73.4(b)(4). Any extensions of time must be requested
by the trial court and obtained from this Court.
Filed: January 12, 2022
Do not publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Fininen, Richard Charles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fininen-richard-charles-texcrimapp-2022.