Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor
870 N.W.2d 920, 498 Mich. 910
This text of 870 N.W.2d 920 (Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor, 870 N.W.2d 920, 498 Mich. 910 (Mich. 2015).
Opinion
reported below: 308 Mich App 318. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate the majority opinion and affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion, to wit, that the plaintiff cannot make the requisite showing of “substantial proximate cause.” MCL 691.1416(1).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
P Terese Allen v. Village of Goodrich
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2024
Jane S Kuhn v. City of Gibraltar
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2024
Robert Tschirhart v. Pamar Enterprises Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2018
Deanna Ray v. City of Lansing
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2018
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
870 N.W.2d 920, 498 Mich. 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fingerle-v-city-of-ann-arbor-mich-2015.