Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor

870 N.W.2d 920, 498 Mich. 910
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided November 4, 2015·No. No. 150819·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

reported below: 308 Mich App 318. Pursuant to MCR 7.305(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we vacate the majority opinion and affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals for the reasons stated in the concurring opinion, to wit, that the plaintiff cannot make the requisite showing of “substantial proximate cause.” MCL 691.1416(1).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor, 870 N.W.2d 920, 498 Mich. 910 (Mich. 2015).

870 N.W.2d 920 (Fingerle v. City of Ann Arbor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

P Terese Allen v. Village of Goodrich
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2024
Jane S Kuhn v. City of Gibraltar
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2024
Robert Tschirhart v. Pamar Enterprises Inc
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2018
Deanna Ray v. City of Lansing
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2018