Finger Lakes Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. O'Dell

101 A.D.2d 1008, 476 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18734
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 25, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 101 A.D.2d 1008 (Finger Lakes Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. O'Dell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finger Lakes Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. O'Dell, 101 A.D.2d 1008, 476 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1984).

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs have sued defendant attorneys for malpractice in connection with their representation of plaintiffs in a labor matter. They seek damages occurring after they discharged defendants, their original attorneys, and during the period plaintiffs were represented in the labor matter by their substituted attorneys, third-party defendants. Plaintiffs appeal from an order freeing third-party defendants from the restrictions of the attorney-client privilege and permitting them to disclose information pertaining to their representation of plaintiffs in connection with the labor matter. We agree with Special Term that, under the circumstances, by commencing the action against defendants and seeking damages for the period during which plaintiffs were represented by third-party defendants, plaintiffs have waived the attorney-client privilege as to the third-party defendants (see CPLR 4503; Matter of Glines v Estate of Baird, 16 AD2d 743; and see Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 4-101 [C] [4]). 11 Because we hold that third-party defendants are relieved from any disability created by the attorney-client privilege, the denial of their motion to dismiss the third-party complaint is also affirmed. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Ontario County, Rosenbloom, J. — attorney-client privilege.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Doerr, Denman, Green and Moule, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fischel & Kahn, Ltd. v. Van Straaten Gallery, Inc.
703 N.E.2d 634 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1998)
Evans v. Reid Riege, P.C., No. Cv930063465 (Dec. 13, 1994)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 12696 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 A.D.2d 1008, 476 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1984 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finger-lakes-plumbing-heating-inc-v-odell-nyappdiv-1984.