Fingar v. Levine

429 So. 2d 840, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20808
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 19, 1983
DocketNo. 82-1318
StatusPublished

This text of 429 So. 2d 840 (Fingar v. Levine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fingar v. Levine, 429 So. 2d 840, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20808 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The judgment of the trial court in favor of the appellees on the appellants’ action for specific performance of a contract to sell real estate is affirmed upon a holding that the contract, as the trial court correctly concluded, lacked the clarity, definiteness, and certainty required for specific performance, see, e.g., Bay Club, Inc. v. Brickell Bay Club, Inc., 293 So.2d 137 (Fla. 3d DCA 1974), and that these deficiencies were not overcome by any evidence which would support a contrary conclusion, notwith[841]*841standing that the appellants were placed on notice of the necessity of presenting such evidence and failed to avail themselves of the opportunity to do so.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bay Club, Inc. v. BRICKELL BAY CLUB
293 So. 2d 137 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
429 So. 2d 840, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 20808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fingar-v-levine-fladistctapp-1983.