Finestone v. Utility Telecom Group, LLC

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 8, 2020·No. 2:20-cv-00230·Unknown

Opinion

iCommLaw Anita Taff-Rice, Esq. (SBN 186039) 1547 Palos Verdes, # 298 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Tel.: (415) 699-7885 Fax: (925) 274-0988 anita@icommlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff JONATHAN FINESTONE DOWNEY BRAND LLP SEAN J. FILIPPINI (SBN 232380) sfilippini@downeybrand.com KELLY M. BREEN (SBN 267715) kbreen@downeybrand.com 621 Capitol Mall, 18th Floor Sacramento, California 95814 Telephone: 916.444.1000 Facsimile: 916.444.2100 Attorneys for Defendants UTILITY TELECOM GROUP, LLC, UTILITY TELEPHONE, INC., and JASON MILLS

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA – SACRAMENTO DIVISION

JONATHAN FINESTONE, Case No. 2:20-cv-00230-TLN-KJN

Plaintiff, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER GOVERNING CONFIDENTIAL v. INFORMATION

UTILITY TELEPHONE, INC., JASON MILLS, and DOES 1-10,

Defendants.

Plaintiff JONATHAN FINESTONE (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants UTILITY TELECOM GROUP, LLC, UTILITY TELEPHONE, INC., and JASON MILLS (“Defendants”) by and through their respective counsel of record submit the following, pursuant to Local Rule 141, hereby stipulate to the below in connection with discovery, pretrial activities, trial, and post-trial activities including appeals, in the above captioned case (“Action”). The Parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 8, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 1. Scope of “Confidential” Material. Any Party or non-party that produces any document, item, material, deposition testimony, or information (collectively, “material”) during discovery in this Action may designate as Confidential material that has not been made public by the disclosing party and that the disclosing party reasonably and in good faith believes constitutes, contains, reveals, or relates to confidential research, development, process, operational, technical, financial, commercial, or marketing information of the designating party. Material considered Customer Proprietary Network Information within the meaning of 47 U.S.C. § 222 shall be treated as Confidential hereunder, whether so designated or not. 2. Designation of “Confidential” Material. A Party or non-party that produces material in discovery in this Action may designate it as Confidential by stamping or otherwise marking it “CONFIDENTIAL” or the equivalent, in a manner that will not interfere with the legibility of the document. Any Party designating material as Confidential shall not designate the entirety of the material as confidential except on a good faith belief that every part of the material is entitled to Confidential designation. If the entirety of the material is not entitled to Confidential designation, the producing Party shall mark only portions or pages entitled to Confidential designation and shall produce the remainder of the document as public. If any Party or non-party inadvertently discloses material which that party deems entitled to designation as Confidential, but which that party did not so designate, such party shall promptly (but no later than 15 business days), upon discovery of such non-designation, inform counsel of record in the Action in writing about the non-designation and the proper Confidential designation. Counsel of record, upon receiving such notice, shall thereafter treat the material as Confidential as if designated pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order. To the extent that, prior to such notice, a Party or counsel of record may have disclosed such material to those other than persons authorized pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order, the Party or counsel shall not be deemed to have violated this Stipulated Protective Order in any respect, but shall make every good-faith effort to retrieve the material promptly from such persons, and to limit any further disclosure pursuant to this Stipulated Protective Order. 3. Challenge to Designations. A receiving Party may challenge a producing Party’s or non-party’s designation of material at any time. Any receiving Party disagreeing with a Confidential Material designation may request in writing that the producing Party or non-party change the designation of a portion or all of the material. Pursuant to Local Rule 251(b), the Parties shall attempt to resolve each challenge in good faith by conferring directly within ten (10) business days after receipt of that request. If the Parties are unable to reach agreement within this ten (10) business day time-frame, it shall be the obligation of the producing Party or non-party to file and serve an appropriate motion to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California (the “Court”), no later than five (5) business days after the conclusion of the ten (10) business day period, requesting the Court to retain confidentiality under Local Rule 140 (and in compliance with Local Rule 141, if applicable). If such a motion is timely filed, the disputed material shall be treated as Confidential under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules on the motion. If the producing Party or non-party fails timely to file such a motion, the disputed material shall lose its designation as Confidential and shall not thereafter be treated as Confidential in accordance with this Stipulated Protective Order. In connection with a motion filed under this provision, the producing Party or non-party shall bear the burden of establishing that the disputed material should be treated as Confidential. 4. Restrictions on Use of Confidential Material. Material produced in response to discovery requests in this Action and designated Confidential shall be used and disclosed solely in connection with the Action and shall not be used or disclosed in connection with any other litigation or for any business, commercial, competitive, personal, or other purpose. 5. Access to Confidential Material. Material designated as Confidential shall be maintained in confidence by the Parties to this Action and their respective counsel of record solely for the uses as provided in Paragraph 4 of this Order and shall not be disclosed to any person except: a. The Court and its officers; b. Those Parties to this Action or officers, directors, members, and/or employees of Parties to this Action who have a legitimate need to see such information in conjunction with the litigation of this Action; c. Plaintiff’s counsel of record in the Action, and employees of his counsel of record; d. Defendants’ counsel of record in the Action, and employees of their counsel of record; e. Persons not employees of Plaintiff’s counsel of record or Defendant’s counsel of record who are expressly retained to assist any of them in connection with the Action including, but not limited to, litigation support professionals, independent auditors, accountants, statisticians, economists, and other designated experts, and the employees of such persons. f. Witnesses, prospective witnesses, or deponents, examined for the purposes of this Action, provided, however, that no such witness shall be allowed to retain possession of Confidential Material he is not otherwise entitled to possess under this Stipulated Protective Order after the completion of his testimony; g. Court reporters and videographers; and h. Other persons as ordered by the Court Prior to disclosure of Confidential Material to any such person in subsections (b) to (f) must agree to be bound by the terms of this Stipulated Protective Order by signing the Certificate of Acknowledgment, attached hereto as Exhibit A and returning the signed Certificate to opposing counsel; 6. Copies and Summaries. Any person who obtains access to material designated as Confidential under this Stipulated Prote

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finestone v. Utility Telecom Group, LLC, (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Finestone v. Utility Telecom Group, LLC (Finestone v. Utility Telecom Group, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related