Finerson v. Lang

Missouri Court of Appeals

Finerson v. Lang

502 S.W.3d 780, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1185, 2016 WL 6872076

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 22, 2016

DocketED 104420

StatusPublished

This text of 502 S.W.3d 780 (Finerson v. Lang) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Finerson v. Lang, 502 S.W.3d 780, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1185, 2016 WL 6872076 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Finerson (“Plaintiff’) appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his one count petition against Melissa Feath-erston and Featherston Law Firm (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (“MMPA”), Section 407.010, et seq. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Anthony Finerson (“Plaintiff’) appeals the trial court’s judgment dismissing his one count petition against Melissa Feath-erston and Featherston Law Firm (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (“MMPA”), Section 407.010, et seq. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

The judgment of the trial court is not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

502 S.W.3d 780, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1185, 2016 WL 6872076, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finerson-v-lang-moctapp-2016.