Fineman v. Greenberg
This text of 614 So. 2d 15 (Fineman v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Susan Lynn Fineman, Linda Ellen Schwartz, and Neil F. Garfield appeal an order , of contempt dated October 14, 1992, and an order denying appellants’ motion for disqualification.
We conclude, and appellees concede, that the contempt order should not allow appel-lees to apply for relief ex parte in the event the purge provisions of the order are not complied with. We therefore strike the [16]*16phrase “on an ex parte basis” from page 4, paragraph 2, of the order of contempt dated October 14, 1992.
In our view the order of contempt is otherwise entirely correct and abundantly justified. See § 38.23, Pla.Stat. (1991). It is affirmed as modified, and the order denying disqualification is affirmed.
Affirmed as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
614 So. 2d 15, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1985, 1993 WL 38199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fineman-v-greenberg-fladistctapp-1993.