Fineman v. Greenberg

614 So. 2d 15, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1985, 1993 WL 38199
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 16, 1993
DocketNo. 92-2306
StatusPublished

This text of 614 So. 2d 15 (Fineman v. Greenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fineman v. Greenberg, 614 So. 2d 15, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1985, 1993 WL 38199 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Susan Lynn Fineman, Linda Ellen Schwartz, and Neil F. Garfield appeal an order , of contempt dated October 14, 1992, and an order denying appellants’ motion for disqualification.

We conclude, and appellees concede, that the contempt order should not allow appel-lees to apply for relief ex parte in the event the purge provisions of the order are not complied with. We therefore strike the [16]*16phrase “on an ex parte basis” from page 4, paragraph 2, of the order of contempt dated October 14, 1992.

In our view the order of contempt is otherwise entirely correct and abundantly justified. See § 38.23, Pla.Stat. (1991). It is affirmed as modified, and the order denying disqualification is affirmed.

Affirmed as modified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
614 So. 2d 15, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 1985, 1993 WL 38199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fineman-v-greenberg-fladistctapp-1993.