Fineman v. Fineman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Fineman v. Fineman

564 So. 2d 646, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5872, 1990 WL 111933

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 8, 1990

DocketNo. 88-2734

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 564 So. 2d 646 (Fineman v. Fineman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fineman v. Fineman, 564 So. 2d 646, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 5872, 1990 WL 111933 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm, except as to the award of attorney’s fees.

We reverse the attorney’s fees portion of the final judgment as it lacks the specificity required by Florida Patient’s Compensation Fund v. Rowe, 472 So.2d 1145 (Fla.1985), and remand so the trial judge can make written findings as to the factors used in his determination of the attorney’s fees awarded the former wife.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS CONSISTENT WITH THIS OPINION.

GUNTHER, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI