Finella v. Overbury

176 A. 575, 13 N.J. Misc. 124, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 369
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJanuary 29, 1935
StatusPublished

This text of 176 A. 575 (Finella v. Overbury) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finella v. Overbury, 176 A. 575, 13 N.J. Misc. 124, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 369 (N.J. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The errors argued by the appellant relate to the charge of the court. The appellant, having argued a rule to show cause in the lower court without reservation of exceptions is precluded from an appeal upon alleged errors appearing in the charge of the court. Supreme Court rule 129. Jones v. City Limit Cab Co., 112 N. J. L. 482; 171 Atl. Rep. 791.

The appeal is dismissed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. City Limit Cab, Inc.
171 A. 791 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1934)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 A. 575, 13 N.J. Misc. 124, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 369, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finella-v-overbury-nj-1935.