Fineberg v. S & S BUILDING COMPANY INC.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Fineberg v. S & S BUILDING COMPANY INC.

249 S.W.3d 242, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 427

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 1, 2008

DocketED 89324

StatusPublished

This text of 249 S.W.3d 242 (Fineberg v. S & S BUILDING COMPANY INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Fineberg v. S & S BUILDING COMPANY INC., 249 S.W.3d 242, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 427 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel R. Fineberg and Lynn M. Fine-berg appeal the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of the builder, S & S Building Co. Inc., in this dispute over a sale contract for a residential villa. The jury found in favor of the builder on both the Finebergs’ breach-of-contract claim for the return of a $25,000 earnest money deposit and on the builder’s counterclaim for damages for the Finebergs’ breach of the sale contract. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b)(5). 1

1

. We grant the builder’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal, in the amount of $15,307.50.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Daniel R. Fineberg and Lynn M. Fine-berg appeal the judgment entered upon a jury verdict in favor of the builder, S & S Building Co. Inc., in this dispute over a sale contract for a residential villa. The jury found in favor of the builder on both the Finebergs’ breach-of-contract claim for the return of a $25,000 earnest money deposit and on the builder’s counterclaim for damages for the Finebergs’ breach of the sale contract. A written opinion would have no precedential value. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, for their information only, explaining the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Rule 84.16(b)(5). 1

1

. We grant the builder’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal, in the amount of $15,307.50.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

249 S.W.3d 242, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fineberg-v-s-s-building-company-inc-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack