Fineberg v. Kosydar

335 N.E.2d 705, 44 Ohio St. 2d 1, 73 Ohio Op. 2d 1, 1975 Ohio LEXIS 566
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 1, 1975
DocketNo. 75-79
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 335 N.E.2d 705 (Fineberg v. Kosydar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fineberg v. Kosydar, 335 N.E.2d 705, 44 Ohio St. 2d 1, 73 Ohio Op. 2d 1, 1975 Ohio LEXIS 566 (Ohio 1975).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The case of Zephyr Room v. Bowers (1955), 164 Ohio St. 287, is controlling herein. In Zephyr, this court stated that:

“Compliance with the mandatory provisions of Section 5717.02, Revised Code, governing the filing of a notice of appeal is essential to invoke jurisdiction of the Board of Tax Appeals. American Restaurant & Lunch Co. v. Glander, Tax Commr., 147 Ohio St., 147, 70 N. E. (2d), 93.”

In order to perfect an appeal from the Tax Commissioner to the Board of Tax Appeals, it is required that written notice to that effect be filed “with the board and with the commissioner within thirty days after * * * order by the commissioner has been given * * R. C. 5717.02. The Board of Tax Appeals, having received evidence from both appellant and the Tax Commissioner with respect to the purported filing of the notice of appeal, concluded that no notice of appeal had been filed with the Tax Commissioner.

After a review of the record herein, this court is of the opinion that the decision of the board, dismissing the appeal for failure to comply with the jurisdictional requirement of R. C. 5717.02, is not unreasonable or unlawful. See Zephyr, supra; and Lee Jewelry Co. v. Bowers (1955), 162 Ohio St. 567.

The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

Decision affirmed.

O ’Neinl, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan, Stern, Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chapman Ents., Inc. v. McClain (Slip Opinion)
2021 Ohio 2386 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2021)
Western Reserve Historical Soc. v. Testa
2014 Ohio 5020 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
Hope v. Highland County Board
564 N.E.2d 433 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1990)
Cross v. Gerstenslager Co.
580 N.E.2d 466 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1989)
House of Good Shepherd, Inc. v. Limbach
525 N.E.2d 488 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1988)
M. Messner & Sons MacHine Co. v. Lindley
381 N.E.2d 251 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1978)
Ryan v. Andrews
361 N.E.2d 1086 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1976)
Northlake Hills Cooperative, Inc. v. Collins
340 N.E.2d 407 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
335 N.E.2d 705, 44 Ohio St. 2d 1, 73 Ohio Op. 2d 1, 1975 Ohio LEXIS 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fineberg-v-kosydar-ohio-1975.