Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Fine v. Pacemaker, Inc.

Fine v. Pacemaker, Inc.

277 A.D.2d 881
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 12, 1950
StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 881 (Fine v. Pacemaker, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fine v. Pacemaker, Inc., 277 A.D.2d 881 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Opinion

Action on two alleged oral agreements under which the defendant obligated itself to pay the plaintiff a percentage of profits realized on the sale of wearing apparel manufactured from goods bought from a source procured by the plaintiff. The defendant interposed the Statute of Frauds as a defense. The complaint was dismissed on the pleadings, the bill of particulars and the opening of plaintiff on the trial. Judgment for the defendant unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Cohen v. Bartgis Bros. Co., 264 App. Div. 260, affd. 289 N. Y. 846; Martocci v. Greater New York Brewery, 301 N. Y. 57.) Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Sneed, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Bartgis Brothers Company
47 N.E.2d 443 (New York Court of Appeals, 1943)
Cohen v. Bartgis Bros.
264 A.D. 260 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1942)
Martocci v. Greater New York Brewery, Inc.
92 N.E.2d 887 (New York Court of Appeals, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
277 A.D.2d 881, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fine-v-pacemaker-inc-nyappdiv-1950.