Fine v. Mayer

159 N.Y.S. 691

This text of 159 N.Y.S. 691 (Fine v. Mayer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Fine v. Mayer, 159 N.Y.S. 691 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

[1, 2] Plaintiff sued for personal injuries, and it appears from the record that she had sprained her wrist quite severely, and, apart from other considerations, had suffered considerable pain and inconvenience. It was pointed out on the argument that the verdict was palpably inadequate, and the suggestion made that, if the parties could agree on increasing the recovery to $100 without costs, the judgment might, as so modified, be affirmed. Since plaintiff, however, is unwilling to acquiesce in this suggestion, the judgment must be reversed, and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 N.Y.S. 691, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/fine-v-mayer-nyappterm-1916.