Fine v. Berman

238 A.D.2d 220, 657 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4080
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 22, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Order and judgment (one paper), Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J., and a jury), entered on or about December 4, 1995, dismissing the complaint in an action to recover for housing discrimination [221] on the basis of sexual orientation, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The verdict was supported by evidence that demonstrated that the Board of Directors had valid reasons for not approving plaintiff’s application, including his admittedly untruthful answers on his application form, his persistent tardiness in paying rent to his present landlord and his lack of any apparent assets, which were not shown by plaintiff to be a pretext for discrimination (see, Hitter v Rubin, 208 AD2d 480, 481). We have considered plaintiffs other arguments and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Mazzarelli and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fine v. Berman, 238 A.D.2d 220, 657 N.Y.S.2d 6, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4080 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

238 A.D.2d 220 (Fine v. Berman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wiener v. 150 West End Owners Corp.
298 A.D.2d 385 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Sirianni v. Rafaloff
284 A.D.2d 447 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)