Findley v. Volvo Powertrain North America

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 31, 2011·No. 10-1782·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-1782

DALE E. FINDLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VOLVO POWERTRAIN NORTH AMERICA; VOLVO TRUCKS NORTH AMERICA; VOLVO GROUP NORTH AMERICA; MACK TRUCKS, INCORPORATED,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:08-cv-03509-JFM)

Submitted: May 11, 2011 Decided: May 31, 2011

Before WILKINSON, GREGORY, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Steven M. Spiegel, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellant. Suzzanne W. Decker, John M. Gilman, MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C., Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Dale E. Findley appeals the district court’s orders

granting summary judgment and awarding costs in favor of his

former employer, Mack Trucks. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Findley v. Volvo

Powertrain N. Am., No. 1:08-cv-03509-JFM (D. Md. Apr. 6, 2010;

July 1, 2010). We grant Findley’s motion to supplement the

record pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 28(j). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Findley v. Volvo Powertrain North America, (4th Cir. 2011).

Findley v. Volvo Powertrain North America (Findley v. Volvo Powertrain North America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.