Findley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Findley v. State

48 S.E.2d 573, 77 Ga. App. 297, 1948 Ga. App. LEXIS 539

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJune 9, 1948

Docket32023.

StatusPublished

This text of 48 S.E.2d 573 (Findley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Findley v. State, 48 S.E.2d 573, 77 Ga. App. 297, 1948 Ga. App. LEXIS 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

Opinion

Gardner, J.

Error is assigned on the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial. The defendant was convicted of cow stealing. The evidence, though circumstantial, is sufficient to sustain the verdict. The grounds of the amended motion, if considered sufficiently complete to be considered, are but elaborations of the general grounds. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial for any of the reasons assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

Error is assigned on the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial. The defendant was convicted of cow stealing. The evidence, though circumstantial, is sufficient to sustain the verdict. The grounds of the amended motion, if considered sufficiently complete to be considered, are but elaborations of the general grounds. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial for any of the reasons assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

48 S.E.2d 573, 77 Ga. App. 297, 1948 Ga. App. LEXIS 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/findley-v-state-gactapp-1948.