Findley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Findley v. State

48 S.E.2d 573, 77 Ga. App. 297, 1948 Ga. App. LEXIS 539

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided June 9, 1948·No. 32023.·Published

Opinion

Gardner, J.

Error is assigned on the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial. The defendant was convicted of cow stealing. The evidence, though circumstantial, is sufficient to sustain the verdict. The grounds of the amended motion, if considered sufficiently complete to be considered, are but elaborations of the general grounds. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial for any of the reasons assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, J.

Error is assigned on the judgment overruling the motion for a new trial. The defendant was convicted of cow stealing. The evidence, though circumstantial, is sufficient to sustain the verdict. The grounds of the amended motion, if considered sufficiently complete to be considered, are but elaborations of the general grounds. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial for any of the reasons assigned.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

Findley v. State, 48 S.E.2d 573, 77 Ga. App. 297, 1948 Ga. App. LEXIS 539 (Ga. Ct. App. 1948).

Pincite

48 S.E.2d 573 (Findley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.