Findley v. Means

73 S.W. 101, 71 Ark. 289, 1903 Ark. LEXIS 36

• Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas
• Decided: March 14, 1903
• Status: Published

Opinion

Battle, J. T.

E. Means had a contract with the United States to transport the mail on route No. 47,529, from Dardanelle to Carden’s Bottoms, in this state, and return, six times a week, from October 1, 1899, to June 30, 190£, and sublet the same to W. W. Findley, as principal, and John Findley and O. R. Findley, as sureties. The Findleys having failed to perform their contract, Means brought this action against them to recover $300, the liquidated damages they stipulated to pay him on account of such nonperformance.

One of the defenses to the action was that it was expressly understood and agreed between plaintiffs and defendant that the contract sued on should not take effect and become operative until it was approved by the postmaster at Dardanelle, and that it had not been approved by him. Plaintiff recovered a judgment for the $300, and the defendants appealed.

The evidence adduced at the trial proved that the contract was delivered by appellants to appellee. There was no written stipulation that it should take effect when certain conditions were performed. Appellants offered, and the court refused to allow them, to prove that it was delivered on the condition named in their defense. It was never approved by the postmaster.

The court committed no error in refusing to admit the testimony. It has been repeatedly held by this court that a deed, bond, note or other instrument of writing delivered to the grantee or obligee.to take effect when certain conditions are performed be-comes operative and binding from the time of the delivery, though the conditions never be performed. Pope v. Latham, 1 Ark. 66; Inglish v. Breneman, 5 Ark. 377; Scott v. State Bank, 9 Ark. 36; Chandler v. Chandler, 21 Ark. 95; Campbell v. Jones, 52 Ark. 493.

Judgment affirmed.

Hughes, J., dissents.