Findley v. F. D. Cummer & Son Co.

Third Circuit

Findley v. F. D. Cummer & Son Co.

109 F.2d 1015

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedJanuary 3, 1940

DocketNo. 7208

StatusPublished

This text of 109 F.2d 1015 (Findley v. F. D. Cummer & Son Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Findley v. F. D. Cummer & Son Co., 109 F.2d 1015 (3d Cir. 1940).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion of the district court, 30 F.Supp. 884, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial and upon the authority of Second National Bank of Reading v. Yeager, 268 Pa. 167, 111 A. 159; Speier v. Michelson, 303 Pa. 66, 154 A. 127, and Philadelphia Record Co. v. Sweet, 124 Pa.Super. 414, 188 A. 631, the judgment appealed from is affirmed..

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion of the district court, 30 F.Supp. 884, denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial and upon the authority of Second National Bank of Reading v. Yeager, 268 Pa. 167, 111 A. 159; Speier v. Michelson, 303 Pa. 66, 154 A. 127, and Philadelphia Record Co. v. Sweet, 124 Pa.Super. 414, 188 A. 631, the judgment appealed from is affirmed..

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

109 F.2d 1015, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/findley-v-f-d-cummer-son-co-ca3-1940.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack