Findley, Roberts & Co. v. Gidney

75 N.C. 395
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 75 N.C. 395 (Findley, Roberts & Co. v. Gidney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Findley, Roberts & Co. v. Gidney, 75 N.C. 395 (N.C. 1876).

Opinion

Reade, J.

When letters of administration or letters testamentary are sued out in this State, all of the creditors of the deceased, whether resident in this State or not, are entitled to prove their debts and share in the assets; and resident creditors have no preference over the non-residents. Nor does it make any difference that there are not more assets here than will pay the creditors here, and that there are assets in another State where the other creditors reside, upon which they might administer and pay their debts. All the creditors can prove their debts and share the assets here, and then, when letters are sued out in the other State, all the creditors can prove and share there, as we suppose.

There is no error. This will be certified.

Per Curiam. Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holshouser v. . Copper Co.
50 S.E. 650 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1905)
Hardenberg v. Manning
4 Dem. Sur. 437 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1886)
Estate of Rowland
1 N.Y. St. Rep. 308 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1886)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
75 N.C. 395, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/findley-roberts-co-v-gidney-nc-1876.