Finck v. Mannering

53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 323
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1887
StatusPublished

This text of 53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 323 (Finck v. Mannering) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Finck v. Mannering, 53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 323 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1887).

Opinion

Follett, J.:

Appeal from an order of a county judge adjudging defendant in- contempt for disobeying an order of the county judge which required defendant to be examined in proceedings supplementary to an execution issued out of the Supreme Court.

[324]*324' This order was made in the course of supplementary proceedings (Code Civil Pro., § 2457) and is reviewable in the first instance, only by “the court out of which the execution was issued,” upon a motion to vacate, of modify the order. (Code Civil Pro., § 2433 ; Chamberlain v. Gallup, 25 Hun, 318.) An order made by a court oh such a motion may be reviewed on appeal by the General Term.

The order reviewed in Hart v. Johnson (43 Hun, 505) was granted by a Special Term. The order reviewed in Baker v. Herkimer (43 Hun, 86) was granted by a County Court (not by a county judge) and the proceeding was supplementary to an execution issued out of the County Court upon a judgment entered upon a transcript of a justice’s judgment, and the order was appealable under the second subdivision of section 2433.

The appeal should be dismissed, with ten dollars costs and printing disbursements.

Hardin, P. J., and Martin, J., concurred.

Appeal dismissed with ten dollars costs including disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 323, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/finck-v-mannering-nysupct-1887.