Fincher Motors, Inc. v. Carriage Trade Auto Brokers, Incl.

421 So. 2d 673, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28172
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 2, 1982·No. No. 82-1176·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Although appellee Jack Wolf may eventually establish that he is not personally obligated to appellant under the provisions of section 673.403(2)(b), Florida Statutes (1979),* he has not done so within the complaint itself. See Parkway General Hospital, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co., 393 So.2d 1171 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981). We therefore hold that the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint, and we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Reversed and remanded.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Fincher Motors, Inc. v. Carriage Trade Auto Brokers, Incl., 421 So. 2d 673, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28172 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

421 So. 2d 673 (Fincher Motors, Inc. v. Carriage Trade Auto Brokers, Incl.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of Central Florida v. Zellwood Farmers Market, Inc.
543 So. 2d 455 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Yates v. Commercial Bank & Trust Co.
432 So. 2d 725 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)