Finch v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction

71 A.2d 301, 194 Md. 728
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided October 29, 2001·No. [H.C. No. 29, October Term, 1949.]·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an application for leave to appeal from the refusal of a writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner is con *729 fined in the Maryland House of Correction for a period' of seven years for the offense of robbery. He claims that the warrant was not issued in his name and the arrest under such circumstances was illegal. He further claims that he was convicted of robbery without sufficient evidence; that he was not tried by a jury. He further claims that he was not informed of the nature and cause of the accusations against him, not confronted with the witnesses against him.

An illegal arrest does not prevent one from being validly indicted and tried. State ex rel. Zell v. Warden, 191 Md. 745, 59 A. 2d 737. The question of guilt or innocence and weight of the evidence cannot be tried on habeas corpus. Rountree v. Wright, 189 Md. 292, 55 A. 2d 847. He does not allege that he was not informed of his right to jury trial, or that he did not waive a jury trial. The writ of habeas corpus cannot be made, except by statute, to perform functions of a writ of error in bringing under review judgments or convictions merely for error or irregularities in the proceedings. Olewiler v. Brady, 185 Md. 341, 44 A. 2d 807.

Application denied, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Finch v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction, 71 A.2d 301, 194 Md. 728 (Md. 2001).

71 A.2d 301 (Finch v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. Warden of Maryland Penitentiary
74 A.2d 833 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)